The zionist promoters who funded Charlie Kirk in a sense created him - gave him his platform and supported him with positive spin. I imagine that they feel that they made him and that he owed them and was even owned by them. So when he showed signs of maybe being less than completely faithful and questioning some things and maybe headed in a (for his backers) dangerous direction, I can imagine that they would be more than a little upset. That and the zionists seemed to be becoming unhinged.
So they are implicated - motive - like it or not (and I do like it).
Had a fun time this weekend at a birthday party and wanted to share my GIF. btw..I learned it's pronounced JIFF with a soft G not GIFF with a hard G. The more you know I suppose.
I would like to learn about the psychology that is fueling these violent and destructive type of events -
A seemingly good kid from a good family, who became something of a monster - does he feel remorse? What is motivating kids and young adults to such extreme and (I would say) anti-social behavior? The weird, pointless meme -type messages that were written on the shells - it's like "Son of Sam" stuff to me. Is it just too much dark internet crap or was he targeted and groomed for this?
My thought along this line is that we all have some dark impulses which we keep in check, but kids don't know how to keep perspective - feel everything with too much intensity and insecurity and drama. I believe I have heard it said by informed persons that kids are inherently somewhat psychopath and certainly narcissist and can have feelings of detachment/isolation. I would say (as amateur psychologist/parent) that confused sexuality is something of a warning sign.
Ok, I'll leave it there.
I gota say , i think there were multiple shooters paid or primed to assassinate Charlie. The roof tranny lover, the marine running from the scene who had what looked like a Glock, and also this very suspicious couple.
I hope the FBi don't just stop, thinking they got their guy.
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1ZkKzZakMqdKv
Hey @KimIversen I would like to share my perspective with you in regards to "conservatives engaging in cancel culture" after Charlie's assassination and that is that you seem to be forgetting that there's an "Objective Truth" where celebrating the assassination of someone who's only "crime" was to have open debate in college campuses IS IN FACT DISRESPECTFUL. So I'm perfectly fine with someone who's salary depends on our taxed dollars being fired and I would also be fine if similar people were to be fired after celebrating "Rachel Maddow's assassination". Now I'll say that the Paul Pelosi's case is Not only different because he wasn't killed but also because there were very bizarre circumstances surrounding the case like how does a complete stranger managed to break into the home of the Third Person from the Presidency!? And why was Nancy advocating with the police Not to release the footage? Of course we now know way more about the case but they're definitely different.
